| Welcome
to the July
2004 issue of the CyberArtisans monthly
newsletter!
Our goal is to present information that will be useful to you as a web
site owner. If these newsletters are not useful to you, please forward
this to a friend who will find it useful. To unsubscribe, follow the directions
at the bottom of this email.
This
Month's Topics
Answer to Last Month's Triva Question
How Hard Is It Really to Work With Microsoft?
Should You Ditch IE?
Answer to Last Month's Trivia Question
As you may recall, last month we presented this trivia question: The
Internet uses Greenwich Mean Time (represented by the abbreviation
GMT) for a universal time reference. Technically, GMT has been superceded
by Coordinated Universal Time, which is abbreviated as UTC. The trivia
question is: What is UTC an acronym for and in what language?
Yep, this was a trick question. The answer is that UTC is not an acronym
for anything in any language. For historical reasons, issues of units
and standards are generally negotiated between the United States and
France. In this case, they decided to call the new time Coordinated
Universal Time in English (abbreviated CUT) or Temps Universel
Coordonné in
French (abbreviated TUC). But neither side was willing to give in and
use the other's abbreviation, so they settled on UTC, which stands
for (but is not an acronym for) Coordinated Universal Time in English,
Temps Universel Coordonné in French, and whatever is the equivalent
in the language of your choice.
How Hard Is It Really to Work With Microsoft?
Microsoft has come in for a goodly share of criticism for its activation
requirements on recent software (Windows XP, Office XP, etc.), and
justifiably, we believe. We think activation hurts Microsoft's customers
more than the original problem hurt Microsoft. Nonetheless, if we want
to (or have to) use Microsoft software, we are stuck with activation
for the moment, at least until MS is forced to think of a better way
to do this. So how hard is it, really, to deal with Microsoft on licensing
and activation issues?
We recently had an opportunity to test this. A friend's disk died and
he asked us to install XP on a new disk. Only one problem: he couldn't
find his product key.
We called Microsoft's installation support number, with, admittedly,
some misgivings. We punched the menu button to speak to a real person,
and within 1 minute was explaining our predicament to a live support
person. She asked us a couple of questions (like what was printed on
the Windows XP CD we had) and then gave us a replacement product key.
She was careful to give it to us three times -- once by phone as we
typed it into the system to be sure it worked, again by phone to record
it for future use, and once by email to be sure we had a correct copy.
Finally, she told us we'd have to activate it by phone (not Internet)
and gave us the phone number for activation.
Activation was equally straightforward. A voice-recognition system
took us through the steps in about 3 minutes. Were we a little surprised?
You bet! But it's nice to know that, however lousy the original idea,
Microsoft is trying to minimize the impact of licensing and activation.
Should You Ditch IE?
There have been numerous reports lately of vulnerabilities in Internet
Explorer that can be used by malicious websites to compromise your
system without your knowledge, at least until your computer starts
mis-behaving. Microsoft has been patching IE to fix these, but the "bad
guys" seem to be able to go from discovery of the vulnerability
to malicious use of it faster than Microsoft can come up with a fix
and issue a patch.
The technical community is divided in their advice to users. Some advise
ditching IE completely and using an alternate browser. Others feel
that IE can be used safely as long as the PC is well-protected by anti-virus,
anti-spyware, and firewall software.
Because most of our customers still use IE, we have no choice -- we
have to make sure our websites work on it. But we are switching amongst
various browsers these days, both to make sure all sites work on all
browsers and to hedge our bets in case things get out of hand in IE-land.
And incidentally, so far our protection seems to be holding.
Note that switching browsers is not without problems. Some websites
will not work right or will not look the same in the alternate browsers.
We went through all our customers' sites (past and present) and found
only 3 that had any problems. All have been fixed (at no charge, of
course).
If you are interested in trying alternate browsers, here's where to
download them:
Firefox is showing a lot of promise and has some useful features, such
as the ability to copy your favorites from IE. The current version
is a late beta, and many (including us) have been using it without
a problem, but we still advise using caution with any beta software.
Mozilla has been around for a while. It is similar to Firefox but considerably
simpler and may soon be eclipsed by it, especially since they are built
by the same company.
Opera is less popular, partly because it isn't free (US$39). It was
developed by a Norwegian company and has less than 1% of the market,
but some folks swear by it.
Remember that one reason IE gets hit by the bad guys so much is because
it is the most popular browser. If one of the alternate browsers gets
a significant market share you can bet that it will become a target
also. So even if you switch browsers, don't neglect your basic protection.
Thanks for joining us this month. See you next month.
Jonathan Spencer
CyberArtisans Web Developers
http://www.cyberartisans.com/
617-965-4110
|