![]() | Web
professionals dedicated to making your web site work for you... |
|
|
Welcome
to the March
2004 issue of the CyberArtisans monthly
newsletter! Really Cheap Websites There are a number of websites that offer to build you a really inexpensive
website if you're willing to do some of the work. Most of these have
proprietary software behind them that let you build the website by
selecting backgrounds, layouts, and fonts, entering your own text and
images, and then activating them. As with anything, they have their
good points and their bad points. Once upon a time, keeping your version of Windows patched was strictly
for your own benefit -- it would protect you against some viruses and
it might make your system work a little better in certain situations.
That time has passed. Keeping your system patched is now part of your
responsibility as a user of the Internet. Why so? Consider this scenario:
Someone discovers a vulnerability in the Windows operating system.
They send out email with a virus that takes advantage of this vulnerability.
Some percentage of naive users open the attachment and infect their
system (because the number of Windows systems on the Internet is huge,
even a small percentage is a large number). It causes no obvious problem
on the infected machine, so nobody notices at first. What it has done,
however, is transform that machine into a remote attacker just waiting
for the right trigger signal. Is it Microsoft's Fault? Microsoft certainly could have designed Windows to be less vulnerable. Note that the operative words are "less vulnerable." An operating system is enormously complex, and there is no way to design one without some vulnerabilities. However, that doesn't change our responsibility as Windows users to keep it repaired. After all, if you buy a car that has repeated brake problems because of a poor design, you still fix the brakes when they fail, don't you? As consumers we should certainly insist that Microsoft make newer versions of Windows less vulnerable. But in the meantime, we have the responsibility to keep our current systems patched. Is Linux Better? Not necessarily better, but certainly not as attractive a target for virus writers. In the screwy world of virus writers, more havoc and publicity confers more status. So knocking out a small percentage of the Linux systems on the Internet wouldn't cause the havoc and publicity that knocking out the same percentage of Windows systems does. In case you're wondering, Linux has been found to have vulnerabilities and has needed patches. But with relatively few systems out in the world, nobody gets very excited about it when it happens, and nothing serious happens if a percentage of Linux users don't install the patch. If Linux begins to really challenge Windows' hold on the consumer market, our bet is that the script-kiddies of the world will take notice. They will find ways to attack it, and then Linux patches will be necessary. There is an easy solution To their credit, Microsoft does provide an easy way
to download and install patches automatically as they become available.
We can already hear some of you techies objecting that some of the
patches have proven problematic and caused problems to some systems.
We know that. But the number of problematic patches has been small
and is frequently an interaction between the patch and certain system
designs, so most users will never see one. And generally a patch can
be removed if it turns out to cause a problem with a specific system.
If you have Windows 2000 or Windows XP, Automatic Update is already
installed (it's in the Control Panel) and only needs to be enabled. Jonathan Spencer |
| CyberArtisans Home Web Programming Services Clients Company Newsletter Contact Us |